Rare satellite-tagged eagle appears in Malta

A rare Eastern Imperial Eagle has roosted in Malta last night in what constitutes the first ever record of the presence of this species on the Maltese Islands. Sporting a satellite tracking device, the massive bird is thought to originate from a conservation project in Austria.

Xi Gmiel. (Photo credit: sakertour)

BirdLife Malta today announced the first ever record of a rare Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) for the Maltese Islands, after it was alerted by birdwatcher members of the organization who spotted the massive eagle over Buskett yesterday early afternoon. An unusual species for the Central Mediterranean, Eastern Imperial Eagles breed in Eastern Europe and Asia and normally migrate over Balkan countries and the Middle East to winter in East Africa, Arabia and India. Although they have a massive wing span of up to two metres, they normally avoid long stretches of open water and do not cross over Mediterranean Islands, hence their rare presence in the region.

The Eastern Imperial Eagle specimen spotted in Malta. Photo taken by Stephen Cilia

The Eastern Imperial Eagle specimen spotted in Malta. Photo taken by Stephen Cilia

The experienced birdwatchers, who are accustomed to seeing this bird in Eastern Europe but never in Malta, followed the bird in various locations. BirdLife Malta soon got the further news that the bird in question was also fitted with a satellite-tracking device. Contacting several Birdlife Partners in Europe such as Hunagry, Bulgaria and Austria, the bird is now thought to originate from a conservation programme in BirdLife Austria.

BirdLife Malta has yesterday alerted the Administrative Law Enforcement Unit of the Malta Police Force to the presence of such a rarity. As further news on the eagle is awaited from Malta and abroad, the organization is urging members of the public to keep a look out for it and alert police of any illegal hunting. Reports to police can be made on 119 while the organization can be reached on 2134 7646

BirdLife Malta calls on Karmenu Vella to take immediate action on illegal trapping season

The Maltese government has (unsurprisingly) decided to open the bird trapping season next week despite calls from the European Commission, and a signed letter by 90 MEPs to ban the senseless practice. The following is a statement by BirdLife Malta in reaction to government’s decision to open the 2015 autumn trapping season.

In a statement issued today in reaction to government’s publication of two legal notices opening a trapping season for finches and another for golden plover and song thrush, Birdlife Malta said it is very disappointed at the Government’s decision and insistence of opening another trapping season when the European Court of Justice will soon be deliberating over Malta’s defiance. BLM has called on Environment Commissioner Karmenu Vella to take immediate action to safeguard migrating wild birds.

BLM said the Government’s defiance is an indication of the lack of appreciation in protecting migrating birds, and of its political commitment to respect the treaty signed by Malta when it became an EU member state. A treaty which explicitly banned bird trapping after 2008.

“Our main concern is that many wild birds are going to be caught and taken from nature for no justifiable reason other than a recreational need. This is a considerable impact on wildlife and that is the reason why bird trapping is illegal under such directives. We hereby call on the Government not to open the trapping season to safeguard and protect migrating birds. In view that Malta would now be taken to the European Court of Justice, we hope the government would retract from opening the season till the ECJ ruling is announced.” said BLM Conservation Manager Nicholas Barbara.

BirdLife Malta concluded that the EU Commissioner for Environment Commissioner, Mr Karmenu Vella, has no option but to initiate interim measures against the Maltese Government, in order to prevent the indiscriminate and unjustified catching of thousands of birds over the coming three months and safeguard their protection. Last year over 8,000 trapping sites were activated allowing the catch of over 33,000 birds through two derogations. Conditions published in legal notices yesterday indicate similar conditions are being applied.

MEPs sign letter to Commission to stop Maltese abuse of EU laws on hunting and trapping

BirdLife Malta has been campaigning at the European Parliament in a bid to obtain signatures from MEPs for a letter to the European Commission to ask it to take action regarding Malta’s persistent abuse of EU regulations on hunting and trapping. Maltese MEPs are (so far) no where to be seen.

MEPs BirdLife

Various MEPs signing BirdLife Malta’s letter to the European Commission to force Malta to abide by EU law (Photo credit: BirdLife Malta Twitter

This is not the first time that BirdLife Malta sought the help of MEPs to write directly to the European Commission. 33 MEPs from ten countries had written to then Commission for the Environment Janez Potočnik in March 2014 to engage a debate about spring hunting in Malta.

According to BirdLife Malta’s twitter feed, there have so far been 19 MEPs from 6 countries that have signed this petition, including:

  • Esther de Lange, Netherlands – European People’s Party (EPP)
  • Helga Stevens, Belgium – European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
  • Ashley Fox, United Kingdom – European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
  • Anneliese Dodds, United Kingdom – Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
  • Linda McAvan, United Kingdom – Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
  • Inese Vaidere, Latvia – European People’s Party (EPP)
  • Artis Pabriks, Latvia – European People’s Party (EPP)
  • Molly Scott Cato, United Kingdom – Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
  • Theresa Griffin, United Kingdom – Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
  • Mary Honeyball, United Kingdom – Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
  • Clare Moody, United Kingdom – Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
  • Paul Brannen, United Kingdom – Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
  • Jude Kirton-Darling, United Kingdom – Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
  • Vicky Ford, United Kingdom – European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
  • Mark Desmesmaeker, Belgium – European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
  • Glenis Willmott, United Kingdom – Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
  • Barbara Matera, Italy – European People’s Party (EPP)
  • Javor Benedek, Hungary – Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
  • Daniel Hannan, United Kingdom – European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)

This list is not even the final one, so BirdLife will hopefully manage to garner more signatures than it did last year. However, we once again fail to see any of the Maltese MEPs taking a stand (unsurprisingly), even though both their European political groups (EPP and S&D) are already represented by MEPs in this petition.

While I was working as a Trainee with the European Commission, I attended a political lunch with Maltese MEP Roberta Metsola alongside my fellow colleagues. I had asked Dr Metsola regarding the Spring Hunting referendum, to which she answered that she had voted NO. As such, I am left wondering why Metsola did not sign this petition if she so calmly admitted that she is not in favour of spring hunting.

I am pretty sure that the stellar work which Metsola is currently doing on the Mediterranean migration crisis does not leave her much legroom for any other migration issue.

On a side note, compare BirdLife Malta’s work with that of opposing NGO FKNK. The former uses its bare resources to bring about a change through legal channels, while the latter has its CEO engaged as a paid consultant with the government to cheat its away to victory.

If Disney films have taught countless children anything, is that villains and cheaters always finish last…on that note, may I remind you all about birds and Disney:

Flagrant is the new buzzword this spring hunting season

As expected the spring hunting season will not be closed as promised by the Prime Minister. Instead, he created a new definition of what he believes to be the acceptable level of illegalities that would merit him closing the hunting season – it has to be flagrant.

Stefan Micallef, 43, of Naxxar, the hunter who illegally shot a protected Common Cuckoo.

Stefan Micallef, 43, of Naxxar, the hunter who illegally shot a protected Common Cuckoo. Photo credit: TimesofMalta

Flagrant is the new buzzword. You better memorise it and start putting it in your vocabulary, as we will be hearing a lot of the Yes voters using it in their arguments after more illegal hunting incidents will be reported in the coming days. That is how these people operate after all, they follow the yardstick provided to them as they cannot think critically for themselves.

So what is flagrant abuse?

According to previous governments, and the current one, it has to be systematic killing of numerous protected birds. The PN government closed the 2007 spring hunt after a flock of honey buzzards was massacred, and the current PL government closed the 2014 autumn hunt after a daily spate of illegalities.

Any rational person in Malta (in this case, the individuals who voted NO), knows clearly enough that the killing of protected birds cannot be quantified in numbers. One, two, twelve, fifty or a hundred makes no difference when they are protected, as it is ILLEGAL. The fact that governments in Malta have the audacity to decide what number is acceptable is unbelievable.

I am very sorry for those law abiding hunters, but enough is  enough. This has not happened once, and this rampant poaching will keep on occurring until spring hunting is banned once and for all. The 49.6% of the population, or as I call them the real ‘minority’, are watching you like hawks. You may want to shoot us down, stuff us and add us to your collection, but we will not let this go.

The government may accept the killing of even one protected bird because it is not ‘flagrant’ enough, but we will not. Furthermore, in light of this referendum, a collective punishment is more than justified. You are all certainly capable of follow the law, you just choose to flagrantly not too.

Hunters will always be Cuckoos in the nest that is Malta

A day after the illegal spring hunting season opened in Malta, a hunter has already shot and killed a protected bird. Will the season be closed after the Prime Minister expressed a zero tolerance policy to illegalities?

The first of many casualties for this Spring Hunting season Photo credit: MaltaRightNow

Reports in local media have stated that a cuckoo was illegally shot in the Manikata area in Malta. The hunter attempted to conceal his trophy but onlookers guided police to the seize the contraband.

After the Yes Campaign won the referendum on Sunday, Prime Minister Joseph Muscat expressed that he will not tolerate illegal hunting in spring any more.
Now it is time to see if this promise will be kept. But we should not hold our breath; after all the poor hunters need to adjust to these new criteria right? In any case, the 49.6% of the Maltese population who voted NO are not about to forgive the Prime Minister or the Opposition leader for this epic blunder, even if the hunting season is closed this second.

Fun Fact – the common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) is a brood parasite. It lays its eggs in the nests of other birds, and once the chick hatches, it instinctively pushes the host’s chicks out of their nest. Kind of similar to how hunters pretend to be sustainable and law-abiding like the rest of the hobbyists and environmentalists.

If the hunting season is closed as the result of this shot Cuckoo, it will probably be the best example of poetic justice Malta has ever seen.

Started from the bottom now we’re here

In less than 24 hours, the Maltese public will vote in a historic abrogative referendum to decide whether they would like to allow spring hunting to continue. While this referendum is posing a very clear yes/no voting scenario for the electorate, it is abundantly clear that tomorrow’s choice is far greater than the issue of spring hunting itself.

This is the reality of the hunting lobby. Political blackmail, bullying

This is the reality of the hunting lobby. Political blackmail, bullying, and downright selfishness. The above photo was taken when the FKNK presented their so-called petition in 2014, and the image below was taken during a 1993 protest. In fact, hunting laws were relaxed prior to the 1996 general election.

Both the yes and no camp have presented their cases to the public. On one side we have cries of animal conservation, animal rights and equal countryside rights for everyone. On the other side, we have concepts of ‘minority’ rights, cultural heritage and equality as European citizens. I have had the opportunity to listen and absorb both sides of the argument, and while I am making no secret of the fact that I will be voting NO, I do believe that this referendum transcends the simple Yes/No vote.

I give you the concept of ‘Citizen Science’, popularised by Alan Irwin in his 1995 book of the same name, and the subject of a painstaking book review I completed in 2011. In a nut shell, this book provides a compelling overview of how and why citizens in general fail to engage in wider scientific debates, which generally results in them being absent or excluded from decision-making processes that have a direct or indirect impact on them.

This is exactly what has happened in Malta for decades over the issue of spring hunting. The non-hunting public has been excluded for too long from this debate. The only ‘players’ in this issue have always been the two political parties and the FKNK, with BirdLife Malta and environmentalists flailing frantically in between trying to achieve some form of resolve.

As social scientists and policy workers, we learn about the ‘bottom-up’ approach to governance (even in environmental governance), where people at the bottom of the food chain come together en masse to contribute to the governance process. The reality is that this concept appears to be somewhat mythological in most democracies, especially in archaic democracy structures such as the one we have in Malta.

But the tide has turned, and this concept has FINALLY arrived in Malta. Citizens are calling the shots now; me, you, your friends and families, and their friends and families, and so on. Politicians have been strong armed into taking a backseat and allowing ordinary non-political people to spar.

This is why this referendum is so important, as it is a reflection of purest form of democracy we could ever hope to witness in this country. In reality, neither the environmentalists nor the hunters are the bad guys in this scenario. They are both fighting tooth and nail for what they believe in. The real bad guys in this scenario are our politicians, who have consistently deceived us and dragged their feet on the hunting issue since our accession to the EU. They lied about the derogation, they lied about the legality of the past hunting seasons, they consistently keep on allowing this atrocious practice to happen in spring – and all this being done in fear of retribution by hunters and the subsequent loss of their votes.

Tomorrow, we have the opportunity to stand and be counted, so that Malta can be ‘Taghna Lkoll’ and we all can have a ‘Futur fis-Sod’, irrespective of our political beliefs.

Tomorrow, you can eliminate the political blackmail that the hunting lobby has using keeping on our political parties. No more threats to vote for someone else if they do not get what they want, no more voting boycotts, no more bullying, just no no NO NO NO!!

Vote NO, and stand to be counted!

Deborah Schembri thinks that those who are voting NO essentially hate Malta

Deborah Schembri defies the promise made by our two political leaders and weighs in on the upcoming spring hunting referendum at a Party event.

Deborah Schembri believes that Maltese people who are voting NO will be going against the government and their Maltese identity. But weren’t politicians supposed to not get involved in this referendum campaign? (Photo credit: TimesofMalta)

Firstly, Deborah Schembri needs to refresh her memory on what rights and privileges are. Hunting is not a Right, and this fact should penetrate deep into the thick skulls of the Yes voters and left to sit there. No one person in this world is entitled or has the right to hunt or enjoy a hobby. It is a privilege that only the most fortunate of the 7 billion people on this earth can enjoy.

Deborah Schembri does not see this referendum as one that is simply about spring hunting. She then states that this referendum is about seeing if we are going to retain the derogation Malta obtained from the EU, and to see if the government will continue to have the power to enact this derogation and regulate spring hunting. Thank you for stating the obvious.

If this referendum passes or not, the government will not have the right to open or close the spring hunting season. “This is a right that we obtained”, she says. I could be mistaken, but Deborah Schembri is hinting that this referendum is essentially an assault on what the government can or cannot do.

“We Maltese have always fought so that we can make and set our own rights and laws”. I agree with you Deborah, and that is precisely what me and the rest of the people who are voting NO are advocating for – we have a constitutional right (THIS is a right!) to ask the government to banish laws which the majority do not want. We want to make our own choices, even when your Government and the Opposition are powerless and nonchalant about issues such as spring hunting.

Deborah then proceeds to repeating herself and stating how the government can responsibly manage the spring hunting season itself, by opening and closing it based on the situation at hand. “BUT the decision has always been the governments and THAT is how it should stay”, she bellows. At this point, it appears as though Deborah is desperately trying to scream “Vote Yes, VOTE YES!!”, but she cannot say that as that would be a massive No No (pun intended).

“We are Maltese, and even if we are or are not hunters, and if we want or do not want hunting, something that we love is definitely our country, and the rights are laws that we enact should remain the property of the Maltese”. Once again, Maltese people have a constitutional right to uphold or request certain laws to be removed. This is the pinnacle of democracy, which apparently doesn’t sit well with Deborah Schembri.

The above statement sums up all that is wrong with the Yes Campaign. They have absolutely no argument, unless they have a personal vested interest (they are hunters themselves or relatives).

Deborah Schembri believes that the general public cannot possibly have the capability of taking decisions on their own. She believes that we need to always look to politicians (or in this case the government) for support and guidance. If we want something, we have to trust the government and its ‘power’ as that is what Maltese have traditionally always done.

So isn’t it ironic how she went against the government in 2010-2011 to advocate for the divorce referendum? I do not really blame Deborah Schembri, as I am sure that she sees herself as an expert of referenda since she was one of those who called for the consultative referendum on divorce in 2011. Yet she cannot fathom the difference between that referendum and this one, and chooses to even ignore her party leader’s statements on not interfering with this referendum campaign.

Whether you support the PN or PL, please ignore the frivolous attempts by our politicians to sway your intents. This vote is the ultimate reflection of democracy and our identity as Maltese people. For the first time in Malta’s history, Maltese people have the power to challenge the law. So the decision is quite a clear one – will you choose to be part of history, or will you choose to remain a puppet at the hands of the PN and PL politicians?

Vote NO!

The hypocrisy of your Spring Selfie

Spring has finally arrived, a welcome sight after a dreary and wetter-than-usual winter. However, spring has the capability of being even better than before this year. People have the possibility to enjoy the full spring months unabated, without having to conform to the schedule of gun-toting bullies who feel that they have the right to deprive other people from natural public spaces.

L-Ahrax tal-Mellieha is a popular site to visit in Spring, especially for campers. Unfortunately, it is not the first time campers have been removed to make way for hunters (Photo credit: LeslieVella64)

Malta experienced a welcome sunny spell last week, and as expected, people decided to ditch the indoors for picnics, hikes and any other thing involving nature and sitting on a blanket. My social media feed suddenly became inundated with ‘Spring Selfies’, spanning the entire Maltese Islands from Xrobb l-Ghagin, to Dingli, to Ramla l-Hamra and Chadwick Lakes.

Then a thought occurred to me: Why are those individuals that are so pro-spring hunting on social media, posting about how much they love spring? How can individuals that will be voting to keep this illegal practice be such blood hypocrites?

There could be two different possibilities for this: Firstly, these individuals may not actually give a damn about other people enjoying the Maltese countryside. Selfishness happens to be a common trait in the Maltese mindset.

Secondly, and most probably, these ‘Yes’ voters actually believe that hunters do not have an impact on the activities of other countryside users. This is not true.

So I will appeal to these people – If you do love spring and enjoy soaking up the sun in the local wilderness (based on your social media presence, it seems like you do), only a NO vote will guarantee this. No matter what the yes camp states, hunting in spring encroaches on the general enjoyment of the Maltese countryside by the rest of the population.

And if you still wish to vote to keep spring hunting, at least have the decency to change your social media posts from “nilghaqu x-xemx”, “beautiful Malta!! #spring”, and “xi gmiel ta’ post”, to “kicked out of a nature walk – sigh”, “no camping during hunting season”, and “swore at by a hunter for entering his property 😦 #areweatwar?”

Vote NO and enjoy Spring!

Ira Losco has already publicly advocated against Spring Hunting back in 2008

Following a blog post published yesterday, where I asked why Ira Losco has not yet publicly declared her stance on the Spring Hunting referendum, a bit more digging has uncovered an interesting fact: Ira Losco has already spoken publicly against spring hunting back in 2008.

Ira Losco has already condemned Spring hunting on a Times of Malta Blog in 2008. But will she publicly speak about the issue now? Photo credit: maltatoday

In the run up to the 2008 general election, BirdLife Malta launched a campaign featuring thirteen personalities asking the Prime Minister and the Opposition leader to end Spring Hunting once and for all. While this awareness campaign was successful in itself, many personalities other than the thirteen featured in this campaign lent their support publicly to end spring hunting.

One of these was Ira Losco, who wrote an entry for her blog on the Times of Malta entitled “Stop Being ‘Twits’ and Save some instead!“. The content of this blog entry is quite standard in terms of why spring hunting should be stopped. Some excerpts from this blog entry can be found below:

“…to write about an issue which ‘some’ tend to conveniently ignore on our island. It’s something I feel very strongly about and should not be ignored.

I DO have a problem with people breaking the law and I am in no way amused that due to 4% of the population who have done so since 2004, I together with YOU have to bear the consequence!

I’m known to be very diplomatic during my interviews and elsewhere, but when I am faced with facts as crystal clear as these above, I have no other choice but to write about such a matter. Wouldn’t it be wiser for hunters to think it through and realise that they ain’t gonna shoot anymore twit when it happens to be legal if they keep killing them before they reproduce?

This blog is simply about raising awareness. It is about an issue which has been ignored for too long. Ikarus saw an untimely death because his over confidence urged him to soar towards the sweltering sun. Unfortunately our feathered friends will see the same untimely death, as they frolic in the Spring sun for a very different reason…. Unless these laws be abided!”

This beckons the question: If Ira Losco “feels very strongly” about the Spring hunting issue, and can lend her voice to the current referendum campaign to effectively abolish this illegal practice once and for all, why has she still not spoken out?

Many will be asking why would anyone care what Ira Losco thinks. As mentioned in my previous post, her celebrity status and her role as goodwill ambassador for sustainable development makes her opinion even more important. If she wasn’t an ambassador, then her opinion would be less valuable in the context of this campaign. Unfortunately she is, and she has a responsibility towards sustainable development in Malta (the ‘use’ of birds for hunting would fall under the ‘natural capital’ aspect of sustainable development).

All other arguments about her not wanting to get involved in ‘political debates’ and not being in it ‘for the publicity’ are arbitrary in light of this blog entry. She has already publicly spoken out against Spring Hunting, so she cannot backtrack on the issue now. THIS is what makes her silence even more peculiar and frankly unjustifiable.

Either way, unless she has changed her mind over the past seven years, Ira Losco will most probably be voting NO to Spring Hunting – and so should you!

Maltese hunters embarrass themselves, and Malta, on the BBC

BBC ALBA, the Scottish Gaelic language counterpart of the BBC, recently covered the hunting referendum on its programme Eòrpa, a current affairs programme covering topical political and social issues dominating headlines in European countries. Even though this programme is not available for view in Malta, it is available to all UK residents, and provides an extremely vivid picture of why the Maltese population should be voting NO.

The programme, originally aired on the 4th of March 2015 (Series 22, episode 13), saw BBC ALBA presenter Alasdair Fraser visit the Maltese Islands and interview both pro and anti-spring hunting lobbies to provide viewers with an insight into what is described as “an island custom”. The full transcript of the section covering Malta can be found here –> BBC ALBA Hunting<–. For UK residents, the programme may be seen by clicking this link.

Alasdair Fraser travels to Malta to cover the Spring hunting referendum for the BBC ALBA program,e

Alasdair Fraser travels to Malta to cover the Spring hunting referendum for the BBC ALBA programme Eòrpa.

Needless to say this coverage is quite embarrassing for the hunters themselves, and even more so for the general Maltese population. People should remember that this programme has been broadcast in Scotland (BBC ALBA has an average weekly viewership of over 600,000 adults), and is still available on demand online on the BBC iPlayer (BBC ALBA has an average yearly online viewership of over 4 million adults). And before the Yes campaigners start screaming ‘F*** the English, go back to your country’ again, they should remember that the UK is our biggest tourism market, and the Scotland is not England.

Below are some excerpts from this programme, which are quite damning and self-explanatory. These excerpts are accompanied by some personal observations in blue.

* * *

Alasdair: Every spring, hunters in Malta are given permission to act in a way not permitted anywhere else in the EU. During a very short season they can shoot migratory birds, an island custom that some people now want to end.”

For Malta’s hunters, April means just one thing: the spring hunting season. For a few weeks guns can be heard all over the island, firing on migratory birds. But in a few weeks’ time, the people of Malta will hold a referendum to decide whether to end this tradition.

A lovely tourism advert for the Scottish: “Malta, we may not care about EU laws, but we really love our customs, especially when the involve shooting migratory birds”

Alasdair: In Gozo I met Danny Rosso, who has hunted most of his life. He is proud of being a hunter and of hunting’s history. He sees the referendum as an assault on his way of life – never mind the BirdLife volunteers and campaigners being regularly assaulted by hunters.

Danny Rosso (Hunter): The referendum is not about shooting protected birds: no-one wants to do that. In fact the referendum is about protecting birds from being shot.

Alasdair: Danny feels hunters like him benefit the island and its environment – one of the fundamental flaws of Maltese hunters is that they feel a sense of entitlement over the environment. Just because hunters spend longer hours wandering the countryside than your average Maltese citizen, it doesn’t mean that one respects the environment more than the other.

Danny Rosso: If the hunters are not out there, illegal activity will increase as poachers will find things easier. They don’t shoot at protected birds when we’re there. A thief normally comes out at night – This is one of those cringe-worthy comments. While it is true that not all hunters are poachers, this argument in farcical at best.

Enter Romina Tolu from the SHout Campaign…incidentally, where is the SHout campaign?

Mark Mifsud Bonnici (St Huberts Chairman). There are 10,000 hunters, but you get only two or three incidents in a season. Mark Mifsud Bonnici clearly did not pass his Mathematics O Level (GCSE) exams. CABS has reported 51 cases of directing poaching in 2014, with another 70 hunting-related incident such as illegal weapons and hunting in non-hunting areas. Incidentally, did the FKNK chicken out from this interview…or should I say they quailed out?

Salvu Portelli (Hunter): As a shooting federation, we back the hunters’ federation on this issue, because, if an incident happens here as has happened abroad, and someone commits a heinous crime with a gun, would that mean that target shooting has to stop? I invite anyone capable of deciphering this sentence to submit their replies in the comment section below.

We consider ourselves a minority, and we back the hunters’ federation not only in their hobby but for other minorities to continue enjoying their hobbies. Again with this BS. I have had enough of this illogical and downright stupid argument. Hunters are not a minority, and no referendum can ever impact other hobbies in Malta. This statement is a clear indication of what the FKNK has instructed Mr Portelli to say, because he clearly has no understanding of what he is saying himself.

Unknown person cooking quail: Over the years hunting has caused harm…Today people hunt, not for food, but for sport and so there is no longer a need to hunt. When there is no other argument available, hunters would resort to the ‘but we need to eat’ strategy. Thank you unknown person cooking quail, thank you.

Joe Sultana (Conservationist): I didn’t touch the shotgun again once I realised how cruel it was to shoot birds in the name of sport. It didn’t make sense…their arguments are not sound. When you are campaigning, you have to offer people something to persuade them to vote for you. so, what are they saying? ‘Vote for us so we can continue killing birds!’

This is the point where SHout should fire Moira Delia and have Joe Sultana at the forefront of their discussion. With all due respect to Moira, a reformed hunter is much more effective at driving home the message than an animal lover. Incidentally, has Moira gone into hiding?

Things haven't been easy for the general Maltese population as well. We need to endure these illegally constructed hunting shacks that litter our countryside.

Things haven’t been easy for the general Maltese population as well. We need to endure these illegally constructed hunting shacks that litter our countryside.

Alasdair: Things haven’t been easy for the hunters. Many of them feel they face more and more obstacles.

Salvu Portelli (Hunter); Last year, we were checked by police four times. They looked at our hunting licence, how many shots we fired and if we caught any birds. I get stopped by police road blocks roughly four times a year. They check my driving licence, if I have had anything to drink and if I have any drugs in the car. So now hunters are feeling uneasy at the police doing their job?

And down there, on these benches, CABS and BirdLife personnel will be watching us recording all shots fired. Jahasra.

To be honest, you have to be really luck to shoot a turtle dove. Is has to be sent by God. This ‘Sent by God’ phrase is a Maltism (Irid jibatilek il-Mulej), but people should appreciate at how primitive it makes Maltese people sounds like to an international audience.

Salvu Portelli: Maltese schools are forever telling children that hunting is bad. Hunting is not that bad, unless it happens in Malta, in Spring.

Just a few days ago, there was a programme in Gharghur on how to train dogs. Two children who were interviewed said they were learning to train dogs so they would have hunting dogs when they grow up. That shows that there are children who want to hunt and keep up the tradition.

I am pretty sure that Scottish viewers think that Maltese children are only interested in pursuing these types of traditions. Additionally, this statement makes me feel uncomfortable. No child in their right mind would want to grow up to be hunter unless his parents brainwash him/her into it. This is the similar mantra with which Maltese parents brainwash their children into becoming staunch Labour and Nationalist supporters. Quite sad indeed.

* * *

The Yes campaign will never be able to provide a valid and sound argument to support their hobby. They feel they are entitled to it, that they can do it just because they have political leverage. You can stop this, so don’t forget to vote NO on Saturday 11th April.